Request failed: 401 Unauthorized in ccmexec.log

myITforum.com Community Forum

Home Forums Blogs Live Support chat Search Articles Wiki FAQ Email Lists Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

All Forums RSS Feed Subscription:

Request failed: 401 Unauthorized in ccmexec.log

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Management Products] >> Microsoft Systems Management Server >> SMS 2003 >> Request failed: 401 Unauthorized in ccmexec.log

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Request failed: 401 Unauthorized in ccmexec.log - 9/21/2008 11:54:58 PM

ttremeth

Posts: 12
Score: 0
Joined: 6/30/2008
Status: offline

This started with errors in execmgr.log Ad were not listed and installing and only two items are in available as actions in sms icon in control panel.

error - Software Distribution Site Settings for the client are missing from WMI. execmgr 9/22/2008 1:14:53 PM 3468 (0x0D8C)

1 - Checked ClientLocation.log andi t is ok
2 - Check LocationServices.log is ok
3 - CCMExec.log Request failed: 401 Unauthorized

Any ideas?

Post #: 1

RE: Request failed: 401 Unauthorized in ccmexec.log - 9/23/2008 1:22:29 AM

ttremeth

Posts: 12
Score: 0
Joined: 6/30/2008
Status: offline

I have completely removed the client and reinstalled it successfully, same issue.

(in reply to ttremeth)

Post #: 2

RE: Request failed: 401 Unauthorized in ccmexec.log - 9/23/2008 12:42:34 PM

rbennett806

Posts: 827
Score: 13
Joined: 6/14/2006
Status: offline

Do you run any sort of client health script? If not, go snag one (search in this forum and you'll find tons of useful info) and manually run it on the machine - they usually fix a lot of the common errors. And if that works, maybe think about setting it up to run via GPO....

Otherwise, if you uninstall the client, make sure you restart and get rid of all the leftover information before installing it again...

(in reply to ttremeth)

Post #: 3