shadster
-
Total Posts
:
280
- Scores: 3
-
Reward points
:
21880
- Joined: 8/6/2008
- Location: Central Ohio
-
Status: offline
|
anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Monday, June 11, 2012 1:47 PM
( permalink)
Is anyone rocking an MBAM integration yet? a lot of the docuemtnation i am seeing so far seems very conuluted... like adding a bunch of regkeys via scripts and then ripping them out later on which seems far from optimal... but i could be missing something? nor was it very clear as to whether or not i need to disable the "enable bitlocker" in a default MDT TS... (Turns out i do... i think :) just added the client install to the deployment TS and will see if i can get it talking back to the db. (not quite sure how it knows where that is since there isn't any config options it looks like) am curious if any of you guys are implementing that yet with sccm2012/mdt2012 + MBAM being deployed to manage laptop only clients (I am separating that in my rules file via [IsLaptop] and deploying wn7 x64 enterprise to them)
|
|
|
|
shadster
-
Total Posts
:
280
- Scores: 3
-
Reward points
:
21880
- Joined: 8/6/2008
- Location: Central Ohio
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Monday, June 11, 2012 5:35 PM
( permalink)
well the client install is pretty simple and straight forward. however i know that this is a fairly new product but it seems a little half baked if we have to go in and import a bunch of regkeys that it couldn't handle on its own (or can pass to it via an install switch etc...) {ok i am done... so end rant} i see that one of those keys tells it to point to our server in the whitepaper ( http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=229053) so i will continue to follow that and see if i can get working however... per this in the whitpaper: UseKeyRecoveryService 0 = don’t escrow key (next two aren’t needed in this case) 1 = ESCROW IN KEY RECOVERY SYSTEM (RECOMMENDED – COMPUTER NEEDS TO BEABLE TO COMMUNICATE WITH KEY RECOVERY SERVICE – VERIFY THIS BEFORE PROCEEDING). does anyone know how I would validate that this communication is actually talking place? Thanks in advance :)
<message edited by shadster on Monday, June 11, 2012 5:37 PM>
|
|
|
|
TXbluzmn
-
Total Posts
:
26
- Scores: 0
-
Reward points
:
6500
- Joined: 5/7/2012
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:22 PM
( permalink)
I have it in the environment and engaging during a task sequence as well. no issues. (finally) do NOT use any of the MDT TS Bitlocker tasks. it will hose you. Use this for your task sequence: One word though... I am deploying Win 7 Enterprise and the diskpart step doesn't work. I partition the whole drive and then run the BDEHDCFG tool and reboot before I install MBAM in my TS. that's the only way I can get it to work. Hope this helps... Let me know if I can help more.
|
|
|
|
TXbluzmn
-
Total Posts
:
26
- Scores: 0
-
Reward points
:
6500
- Joined: 5/7/2012
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:37 PM
( permalink)
They're basically wanting the machine to be joined to the domain first. This isn't a perfect/scripted app like some, but it is complete. I've had much success with it bitlocking 706 of 918 machines with te TPM scripts, BDEHDCFG, and MBAM client pushed through SCCM 2012 task sequence. That said, it took a lot of trial and error.
|
|
|
|
shadster
-
Total Posts
:
280
- Scores: 3
-
Reward points
:
21880
- Joined: 8/6/2008
- Location: Central Ohio
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:19 PM
( permalink)
thanks for the input... i am running into similar issues but i will try adding the BitLocker partition feature and command. have you implemented any of the Group policy settings? and are you using the Addregkeys/remove regkeys and the scirpt that imports them as well after you install the client?
|
|
|
|
shadster
-
Total Posts
:
280
- Scores: 3
-
Reward points
:
21880
- Joined: 8/6/2008
- Location: Central Ohio
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:28 PM
( permalink)
Txbluzmn, you posted "use this for your TaskSequence:" is this an image or link that didn't come through?
<message edited by shadster on Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:47 PM>
|
|
|
|
TXbluzmn
-
Total Posts
:
26
- Scores: 0
-
Reward points
:
6500
- Joined: 5/7/2012
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Thursday, June 21, 2012 5:50 PM
( permalink)
Yes. I had no issues with the GPO's in place during the imaging process. Yes, I used the scripts. The document could be more clear for noobs about the diskpart step on a bare metal vs. a refresh, but this is the deal in a nutshell: If you don't have an image captured from a machine with the bitlocker partition, when you apply your image to the C drive Windows will give that 300mb partition a drive letter which will not work for Bitlocker. If you're refreshing a PC, create a single partition with your Diskpart step and create a step for the BdeHdCfg ala the "Refresh" rules at the bottom of the page. Hope this helps!
|
|
|
|
TXbluzmn
-
Total Posts
:
26
- Scores: 0
-
Reward points
:
6500
- Joined: 5/7/2012
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Friday, June 22, 2012 12:16 PM
( permalink)
that was a link to the deployment guys page that I think you're already using. sorry... I'm too much of a noob here for them to post my links yet I guess..... HA!
|
|
|
|
shadster
-
Total Posts
:
280
- Scores: 3
-
Reward points
:
21880
- Joined: 8/6/2008
- Location: Central Ohio
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Friday, June 22, 2012 1:08 PM
( permalink)
that is funny! you have been helpful and will be sure to mark your post as such to help get you some 'credd' :) I am using enterprise as well and didn't capture with the extra partition. (extrapartition =no) but if that is the culprit it would be easy enough to remediate. i thought .wim's didn't contain multiple partition information and could span multiple partitions? anyways... i found a syntax error in my switch in regards to the add/remove entries by missing the colon ":" i.e. "cscript.exe StartMBAMEncryption.wsf /AddRegFile:AddMBAMRegEntries.reg /RemoveRegFile:RemoveMBAMRegEntries.reg" am testing this now... hopefully this will work.
|
|
|
|
shadster
-
Total Posts
:
280
- Scores: 3
-
Reward points
:
21880
- Joined: 8/6/2008
- Location: Central Ohio
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Monday, June 25, 2012 1:36 PM
( permalink)
still no dice... it keeps timing out as i am guessing that the account running the command doesn't have mbam access. error code 0x803d000d "the remote endpoint does not exist or could not be located" my reasoning lies in that after the process ends, and while still logged in as local administrator, when I try to navigate to the regkey URL in IE... ... i get prompted for credentials! arghh... so i am sooo closer :)
|
|
|
|
shadster
-
Total Posts
:
280
- Scores: 3
-
Reward points
:
21880
- Joined: 8/6/2008
- Location: Central Ohio
-
Status: offline
|
Re:anybody got MBAM integration working yet?
Friday, June 29, 2012 2:49 PM
( permalink)
well finally got it going via an MDT2012 sequence... ended up having it create the default single partition and then running the ztibde.wsf as the very next step... then install the mbam client during the applications install phase and then last step is kick the script... here is the interesting point... and hopefully someone else will find helpful seems like i had an opposite problem from most in that i couldn't get past the script timeout until i first got rid of an allias that we set up to make the test url easy to remember (mbam.domain.com) AND we changed the path to use https://server:443/PathToService not sure how this will work and manage keys yet if security forces us to implement TPM + PIN... (argh) but so far we are stable! :) actually... does anybody know if i can just import an MDT gather task as the first step of my Sccm TS to basically enable my rules file for deployment via sccm instead of mdt? have that pretty slick and fairly elegant and that is keeping me from recreating them in SCCM and keeping it in MDT for now
<message edited by shadster on Friday, June 29, 2012 2:53 PM>
|
|
|
|